In his September 10 speech at the White House Obama made the following revealing remark on Syria:
"Across the border, in Syria, we have ramped up our military assistance to the Syrian opposition. Tonight, I again call on Congress to give us additional authorities and resources to train and equip these fighters. In the fight against ISIL, we cannot rely on an Assad regime that terrorizes its people; a regime that will never regain the legitimacy it has lost. Instead, we must strengthen the opposition as the best counterweight to extremists like ISIL, while pursuing the political solution necessary to solve Syria's crisis once and for all".
In these words, Obama admits that they have been providing military assistance to the Syrian opposition terrorists and that they will increase that assistance. By arming the rebels fighting against Assad, they prolong the civil war, resulting in more deaths. If it were not for the foreign support of the rebels, the rebels would have been defeated long ago and the war would have been over.
Secondly, the opposition forces that America support, collaborate with ISIS. Therefore they are not a counterweight to ISIS. There is no moderate opposition in Syria. America is planning on fighting ISIS by supporting the allies of ISIS. Not logical, if America is truly trying to defeat ISIS. Of course the current conflict isn't really about ISIS. ISIS is an American/Israeli intelligence asset that provides a pretext for America to start flying airstrikes into Syria, in plan B in their attempt for regime change, after their phony chemical weapons attack failed to garner the necessary support for their war of terror against Assad.
Furthermore, in the above quote Obama asserts that the Assad regime has lost its legitimacy and terrorizes its people. In reality, it is Assad's regime who is the main force fighting these nutcases from groups like ISIS and Al Nusra Front, and it is the US Government that has lost it's legitimacy by terrorising the rest of the world with its psychopathic serial wars of aggression.
No comments:
Post a Comment